PRU 13

i am interested at this time to write on the battle of words that often occur between bn and pr component parties.

should we read the reports made ​​by bn and all their media flagship, we might sense that the party is trying to find the opposition’s faults and weaknesses.  along with that line, we might identify that government-related media constantly declares that bn component party is the party to be supported with undivided loyalty as they have rightfully served malaysians, thus leave us the opportunity to savour prosperity and wealth since independence.  quite the opposite, bn is always silence and continually keep their distance to any opinion that regard the opposition is benevolent and generous.  as reported by dap, pas and keadilan, their multi millions projects for rakyat are always hidden in bn’s speech, what is left is the half truths information on the lackadaisical work from the opposition who neglect the rakyat. 

in this case, we don’t know who is wrong and who is right. people act and behave in their own mold of political belief.  the magnitude of such faith and confidence in the party will always based on how much does the party has done to the public, especially in championing each of the multiethnic society.

upon reading reports from various parties, i may want to conclude that they are all geared up towards social harmony in malaysia. however, on the other hand, these non-aligned parties, every so often accuse each other for being anti-malay, anti-chinese, anti-islam.   the expressions are sometimes are in a much twisting facts which are treated and delivered to reach the party’s objective.  i guess this idea would be much clearly clarified in bahasa:  

namun, di sebalik perkara ini, ketidak sehaluan fahaman antara parti ini menyebabkan mereka saling tuduh menuduh sesama mereka dengan ungkapan-ungkapan anti-melayu, anti-cina dan anti-islam.  kadangkala ungkapan-ungkapan tersebut banyak yang memutar belitkan fakta, diolah dan disampaikan dengan hala tuju dan objektif parti masing-masing.

i sense that the debate between parties are none other than rhetoric political discourse.   what has been projected, presented and explained are aimed to educate the rakyat to help them make wise decision in evaluating and reviewing any party of their interest.  but, sometimes, rakyat may fall into political trick that accidentally they would feel suspicious to other party. at this juncture, i may call this as dilemma. who is wrong? who is right? who is good? who is bad?  for politicians, this is opportunity.  wittingly, by looking at the current scenario and that every party wants to win in this pru 13, i may say that ‘whoever is lord of putrajaya has his hand on the throat of malaysia’.  sounds cool, right?

should bn collapse in this upcoming 13^th general election (though this sounds ridiculous), it would become a very big story in malaysia’s history, and they will become the opposition party should the current existing opposition wins and form their own government.  so, in this case the rakyat needs to carefully evaluate the party that they want to vote.

regardless of what party that wins, i  hope that the new government must firmly defend the special rights of the malays, uphold the power of malay kings and islam as the official religion as pronounced in the constitution. decide a party which u believe is competent to propagate racial harmony. but, does it matter who wins? as long as the parties are in line with the malay supremacy?

at the same time, i also want to understand what does the chinese say on their label of ‘ultra kiasu’, i.e. severe defensive act in defending chinese culture and language in primary education to university. but, is it wrong? even malay and indian would become defensive should there are underlying hidden agendas to interfere their culture and belief.  again, i notice this is another opportunity to austerely create a perfect recipe to ignite racial anxiety.  if that would be a case, it could be inferred that malays, chinese and indians would never be able to sit together as each of them is always suspicious and become prejudice at all times.

malay has their own claims, as well as the chinese.  indians are also fighting over many issues for their survival.  conflict arises when there is a thinking that shout if the chinese rules, most probably malays will lose all of their privileges. when malay rules, chinese claim that there are always injustice that malay-dominated government wants to get rid off their chinese identity.  but, what happen if indian rules?  no one think that would happen.  but, is it true?  in common with the antecedent viewpoints, i may want to say that these ethnics  feel restless and agitated. 

to the malay, tanah melayu has become their homeland since their ancestors and with that in line, the land must be protected by all means.  ironically, there are numerous hectares of tanah melayu which is claimed as the malay’s homeland has become a property of the non-malays through sell and buy.  under limited knowledge of malaysian constitution, i might want to flashback that the country was known tanah melayu peninsular, now become peninsular malaysia.  it has changed. or could it be changed again?  the word ‘malay’ remains but with the addition ‘sia’.  i could not understand who give the name? would there be ‘chinesesia’ or ‘indiasia’?

there are many who always suspicious and become prejudice to other ethnic.  i wish that this could be stopped.  should these different ethnic with different background, way of life, belief and culture join hands together, coupled with energy and wisdom, i believe malaysia will continue to prosper and the rakyat would eternally live in harmony.  in such a multiculturalism land where malay is the majority, please bear in mind that always uphold malay supremacy in this blessed land. other ethnic so far has acquired what they want with help from the current government.

think twice before u cast your vote.